RAM comparison Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT51264BA160B.C16F 4GB

Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT51264BA160B.C16F 4GB

Overall score

Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 4GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BA160B.C16F 4GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.3 13.1

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.4 8.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BA160B.C16F 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2180 2142

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns