RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB vs Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB vs Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

26 374

Around 93% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

17.9 0.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.7 1.0

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3705 269

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns