RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDR1 8GB vs Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB

Crucial Technology CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDR1 8GB vs Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDR1 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDR1 8GB

Reasons to consider
Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB

Faster write speed, GB/s

12.7 11.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 17000

Around 1.51 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDR1 8GB

Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2897 2543

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns