RAM comparison Elpida EBJ40EG8BFWB-JS-F 4GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FD 16GB

Elpida EBJ40EG8BFWB-JS-F 4GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FD 16GB

Overall score

Elpida EBJ40EG8BFWB-JS-F 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Elpida EBJ40EG8BFWB-JS-F 4GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FD 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

22 26

Around -18% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.1 13.9

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 14200

Around 1.35 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Elpida EBJ40EG8BFWB-JS-F 4GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSE.16FD 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-14200, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
Timings / Clock speed

no data 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2558 2646

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns