RAM comparison Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMSA3310ME96HAF-3200 8GB

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMSA3310ME96HAF-3200 8GB

Overall score

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3310ME96HAF-3200 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

56 106

Around -89% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

8.2 2,069.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 5300

Around 4.83 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3310ME96HAF-3200 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC-5300, PS1: 1.5V, PS2: 1.8V, CAS Supported: 3 4 5 PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28
Timings / Clock speed

no data 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

734 1964

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns