RAM comparison Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB vs Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 8GB

Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB vs Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 8GB

Overall score

Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

22 30

Around 27% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

17.7 17

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 17000

Around 1.25% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB

Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3075 3142

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns