RAM comparison AMD R538G1601U2S 8GB vs Corsair CMT12GX3M3A2000C9 4GB

AMD R538G1601U2S 8GB vs Corsair CMT12GX3M3A2000C9 4GB

Overall score

AMD R538G1601U2S 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
AMD R538G1601U2S 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

19 29

Around 34% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

18.4 15.2

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.3 11.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 8500

Around 1.51% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMT12GX3M3A2000C9 4GB

Complete list of technical specifications

AMD R538G1601U2S 8GB

Corsair CMT12GX3M3A2000C9 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC3-8500, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 7-7-7-20 / 1066 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3189 2998

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns