RAM comparison Apacer Technology 78.A1GA0.9L4 2GB vs Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB

Apacer Technology 78.A1GA0.9L4 2GB vs Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB

Overall score

Apacer Technology 78.A1GA0.9L4 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Apacer Technology 78.A1GA0.9L4 2GB

Reasons to consider
Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

22 111

Around -405% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.7 1,765.7

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 6400

Around 3.33 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Apacer Technology 78.A1GA0.9L4 2GB

Shanghai Kuxin Microelectronics Ltd NMUD480E82-2666 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 3 4 5 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

461 3075

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns