RAM comparison Corsair CMG32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB vs Netac Technology Co Ltd EKBLUE4162417AD 8GB

Corsair CMG32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB vs Netac Technology Co Ltd EKBLUE4162417AD 8GB

Overall score

Corsair CMG32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMG32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Reasons to consider
Netac Technology Co Ltd EKBLUE4162417AD 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

24 29

Around -21% lower latency
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMG32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Netac Technology Co Ltd EKBLUE4162417AD 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3412 2946

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns