RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FBD 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FBD 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FBD 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FBD 16GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

13.9 13.6

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

10.0 9.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FBD 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2468 2507

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns