RAM comparison Hynix Semiconductor (Hyundai Electronics) GKE160SO102408-2400 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT12864AA667.K8F 1GB

Hynix Semiconductor (Hyundai Electronics) GKE160SO102408-2400 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT12864AA667.K8F 1GB

Overall score

Hynix Semiconductor (Hyundai Electronics) GKE160SO102408-2400 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Hynix Semiconductor (Hyundai Electronics) GKE160SO102408-2400 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

24 49

Around 51% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.5 1,871.0

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 5300

Around 3.62% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT12864AA667.K8F 1GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Hynix Semiconductor (Hyundai Electronics) GKE160SO102408-2400 16GB

Crucial Technology CT12864AA667.K8F 1GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PC2-5300, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 3 4 5
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 5-5-5-15 / 667 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2925 649

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns