RAM comparison Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8266.M16FH 16GB

Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8266.M16FH 16GB

Overall score

Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8266.M16FH 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

22 24

Around -9% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

18.4 14.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.4 13.0

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8266.M16FH 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36 40 42 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Timings / Clock speed

no data / 2400 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3524 3255

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns