RAM comparison Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB vs Kingston 99U5701-049.A00G 16GB

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB vs Kingston 99U5701-049.A00G 16GB

Overall score

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5701-049.A00G 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

45 106

Around -136% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

7.6 2,069.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 5300

Around 3.62 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Kingston 99U5701-049.A00G 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC-5300, PS1: 1.5V, PS2: 1.8V, CAS Supported: 3 4 5 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

no data 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

734 2477

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns