RAM comparison Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB vs Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD 16GB

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB vs Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD 16GB

Overall score

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Reasons to consider
Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

65 106

Around -63% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

8.5 3

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

5.8 2,069.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 5300

Around 4.02 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Qimonda 72T128420EFA3SB2 1GB

Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC-5300, PS1: 1.5V, PS2: 1.8V, CAS Supported: 3 4 5 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

no data 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

734 1981

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns