RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMT3170ME68F9F1600 4GB vs Kingston KX830D-HYC 4GB

Ramaxel Technology RMT3170ME68F9F1600 4GB vs Kingston KX830D-HYC 4GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMT3170ME68F9F1600 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMT3170ME68F9F1600 4GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

12.1 11

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

7.6 7.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Kingston KX830D-HYC 4GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMT3170ME68F9F1600 4GB

Kingston KX830D-HYC 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1892 1757

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns