RAM comparison Samsung M393B5170FH0-CK0 4GB vs Corsair CMY16GX3M2A1866C 8GB

Samsung M393B5170FH0-CK0 4GB vs Corsair CMY16GX3M2A1866C 8GB

Overall score

Samsung M393B5170FH0-CK0 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Samsung M393B5170FH0-CK0 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

27 67

Around 60% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

11.8 6.7

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

7.3 5.3

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMY16GX3M2A1866C 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Samsung M393B5170FH0-CK0 4GB

Corsair CMY16GX3M2A1866C 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2057 1401

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns