RAM comparison AMD R5316G1609U2K 8GB vs Apacer Technology 78.BAGM6.40C0B 4GB

AMD R5316G1609U2K 8GB vs Apacer Technology 78.BAGM6.40C0B 4GB

Overall score

AMD R5316G1609U2K 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
AMD R5316G1609U2K 8GB

Reasons to consider
Apacer Technology 78.BAGM6.40C0B 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

22 73

Around -232% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

13.8 6.3

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

7.1 5.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

17000 12800

Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

AMD R5316G1609U2K 8GB

Apacer Technology 78.BAGM6.40C0B 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1309 2191

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns