RAM comparison Corsair CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 16GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4B.16FE 16GB

Corsair CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 16GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4B.16FE 16GB

Overall score

Corsair CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.3 15.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 21300

Around 1.2% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4B.16FE 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 16GB

Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4B.16FE 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
Timings / Clock speed

20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3146 3373

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns