RAM comparison Corsair CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 8GB vs AMD R538G1601U2S-UO 8GB

Corsair CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 8GB vs AMD R538G1601U2S-UO 8GB

Overall score

Corsair CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 8GB

Reasons to consider
AMD R538G1601U2S-UO 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

26 42

Around -62% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.2 13.4

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

10.0 8.0

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 8GB

AMD R538G1601U2S-UO 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 9 PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2303 2634

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns