RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB vs Chun Well Technology Holding Limited MD4U1632160DCW 16GB

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB vs Chun Well Technology Holding Limited MD4U1632160DCW 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Reasons to consider
Chun Well Technology Holding Limited MD4U1632160DCW 16GB

Faster write speed, GB/s

15.4 14.7

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 17000

Around 1.25 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Chun Well Technology Holding Limited MD4U1632160DCW 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3705 3579

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns