RAM comparison Kingmax Semiconductor FLFF65F-C6NG9 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8266.M16FD 16GB

Kingmax Semiconductor FLFF65F-C6NG9 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8266.M16FD 16GB

Overall score

Kingmax Semiconductor FLFF65F-C6NG9 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingmax Semiconductor FLFF65F-C6NG9 4GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8266.M16FD 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

29 73

Around -152% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

17.6 6.2

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

13.7 3.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 10600

Around 2.01 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingmax Semiconductor FLFF65F-C6NG9 4GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8266.M16FD 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

965 3432

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns