RAM comparison Kingmax Semiconductor FLGF65F-D8WMB 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT51264BA160B.C16F 4GB

Kingmax Semiconductor FLGF65F-D8WMB 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT51264BA160B.C16F 4GB

Overall score

Kingmax Semiconductor FLGF65F-D8WMB 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingmax Semiconductor FLGF65F-D8WMB 4GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BA160B.C16F 4GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.3 13.1

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.4 7.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingmax Semiconductor FLGF65F-D8WMB 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BA160B.C16F 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2111 2142

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns