RAM comparison Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 4GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMT3160ED58E9W1600 4GB

Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 4GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMT3160ED58E9W1600 4GB

Overall score

Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

37 40

Around 8% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.4 12.3

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

10.4 7.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 12800

Around 1.5% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMT3160ED58E9W1600 4GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 4GB

Ramaxel Technology RMT3160ED58E9W1600 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2179 1806

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns