RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
Menu
RAMs
RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
Русский
English
Español
Português
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Polski
中文
日本語
takeMS International AG TMS2GB264D082-805G 2GB
Shenzhen Xingmem Technology Corp KRE-D4U2400M/8G 8GB
Compare
takeMS International AG TMS2GB264D082-805G 2GB vs Shenzhen Xingmem Technology Corp KRE-D4U2400M/8G 8GB
Overall score
takeMS International AG TMS2GB264D082-805G 2GB
Overall score
Shenzhen Xingmem Technology Corp KRE-D4U2400M/8G 8GB
Differences
Specifications
Comments
Differences
Reasons to consider
takeMS International AG TMS2GB264D082-805G 2GB
Report a bug
Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
46
72
Around 36% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s
5
15.3
Average value in the tests
Reasons to consider
Shenzhen Xingmem Technology Corp KRE-D4U2400M/8G 8GB
Report a bug
Faster write speed, GB/s
8.0
1,852.4
Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
19200
6400
Around 3 higher bandwidth
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
takeMS International AG TMS2GB264D082-805G 2GB
Shenzhen Xingmem Technology Corp KRE-D4U2400M/8G 8GB
Main characteristics
Memory type
DDR2
DDR4
Latency in PassMark, ns
46
72
Read speed, GB/s
5,535.6
15.3
Write speed, GB/s
1,852.4
8.0
Memory bandwidth, mbps
6400
19200
Other
Description
PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5
PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed
5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz
15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
858
1817
takeMS International AG TMS2GB264D082-805G 2GB RAM comparisons
Kingmax Semiconductor KLDE88F-B8KU5 2GB
Apacer Technology GD2.0918CT.001 4GB
Shenzhen Xingmem Technology Corp KRE-D4U2400M/8G 8GB RAM comparisons
Hoodisk Electronics Co Ltd GKE160SO102408-2666 16GB
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
CAS Latency (CL) *
Frequency (Mhz) *
calculate
Absolute Latency
0 ns
RAM 2
CAS Latency (CL) *
Frequency (Mhz) *
calculate
Absolute Latency
0 ns
Latest comparisons
Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 4GB
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GTZN 16GB
takeMS International AG TMS2GB264D082-805G 2GB
Shenzhen Xingmem Technology Corp KRE-D4U2400M/8G 8GB
Samsung M393B1G70BH0-YK0 8GB
G Skill Intl F4-2800C16-4GRK 4GB
SK Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 4GB
OM Nanotech Pvt.Ltd V1D4SF32GB2G82G83200 32GB
Essencore Limited KD48GU88C-26N1600 8GB
G Skill Intl F4-3000C16-16GISB 16GB
Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FDD 16GB
Elpida EBJ17RG4EFWA-DJ-F 16GB
Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4RL.M8FB1 16GB
TwinMOS 8DHE3MN8-HATP 2GB
Corsair CM4B8G2J2133A15S 8GB
Kingston 9905403-011.A03LF 2GB
Samsung 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1B1 16GB
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2GB
Kingmax Semiconductor GSLF62F-D8---------- 4GB
Kingston 2GB-DDR2 800Mhz 2GB
Avexir Technologies Corporation DDR4-3000 CL16 8GB 8GB
SK Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
Corsair CMD16GX4M4B3200C14 4GB
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 8GB
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 16GB
Elpida EBJ17RG4EFWA-DJ-F 16GB
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3466C16 8GB
Report a bug
×
Bug description
Source link